Sunday, 27 May 2012

Mondial de la Bière: Now This Looks Good

Moving has been a trade-off, some excellent perks for some noteworthy absences - in beer options as in the rest of life.

Yet, one area I believe I am winning is in the city's major beer festival.  Toronto's Festival of Beer is expensive (at nearly $40 to enter with only five free sample tokens) and just 200 beers, whereas Montreal's Mondial de la Bière is free to enter, sells $1 sample tickets, and has 637 beers from 191 different breweries!  This seems better to me on all fronts!

For those who are interested, the 19th Annual event runs from June 6-10, 2012 at Place Bonaventure and features ciders as well, and also workshops, live brewing demonstrations, exciting sounding food kiosks, contests, a mobile app (for getting around and rating), live music, DJs, off-site evening events, and more!

Check out the website for more details, for exhibitor lists (and selections), and more!

I'll definitely be there in Thursday, June 7th and hopefully againt on the 9th and/or 10th as I have many beers to taste (anew and again).

Join me, or look for me!  Review of the event and of countless beers to come!

Thursday, 24 May 2012

Visiting Benelux Brasserie Artisinale et Cafe

Having finally attended the Sherbrooke location of Benelux, I remain anxious for their (apparently delayed) opening of a second location near my home in Verdun.

Though not unquestionably fantastic, there are enough good things about this craft brewpub to keep me intrigued and returning for more, even if there is some room for improvement.


Benelux offers an excellent evening atmosphere with a fine trendy/art deco/loft-like interior, nice furniture, very clean bathrooms, and sells flights to a decent-sized crowd (even on a weekday evening).  The service was good and, though the flights may be a bit pricey (at $10 for 5 four-ounce samples), you do get 20 ounces for your money and two flights lets you taste ten of their rotating twelve beer selection.

This diversity and quantity are assuredly pluses, though for a craft beer bar, perhaps a cask would be a nice addition.  Nonetheless, I tried the following and offer my brief thoughts on each and then collectively afterwards in the most important part of the review:

Eponyme (a saison at 6.5% ABV) which was very pleasant and a bit peaty alongside its yeasty breadiness.  I would gladly drink this again and (if consuming less without company) will offer more detailed notes then!

Armada (American Brown Ale at 6% ABV) is also quite nice, though a touch experimental insofar as it brings a substantial pine-like hoppiness to the style that is bolder than most (even American) browns.  Still, quite enjoyable and a successful experiment/intensification of the style descriptors and this could almost be called a dark IPA (though without the prevalent cascade signature of most such ales, even if piney on its own terms).

Yakima (American Pale Ale at 5.5% ABV) was quite pleasingly citrusy and crisp to the tongue.  A very fine pale ale and probably my favourite of the three listed so far!

Anniversaire 2012 (double IPA at 8% ABV) was nice, if paler than expected, though cascade hops to a fair degree met with style expectations.  Good and as expected, if not exceptional.

Cigogne (Pilsner at 5.2% ABV) was quite nice with just enough bitterness to nuance the style.  Best pale lager I have had in a while - though I don't have many.  Easy drinking and will probably do well on a hot summer day!

Croc-en-Jambe (American IPA at 6.3%) walked a fine line between drying to a nice extreme and astringency.  I quite enjoyed it, but found it to be longer lasting in its citrusy dryness than even the double IPA which is not bad per se, but perhaps odd and noteworthy.  That said, I enjoyed it, though I was neck-deep in hops at this point and wouldn't recommend it for the faint of hops heart.

Cuda (IPA at 6.5%) was quite nice and offered a late forming dryness and aftertaste.  Not as bitter as some of those above, but more like a cross between a good English IPA and a decent US pale.  Though after the quantity I had consumed, I should try this again!

Finally, we come to Lux Rousse, the sole, but substantial disappointment of the night.  I'd presume it was personal or simply quantity consumed, but as this was my first of the night and as my fellow beer geek attendee felt the same, it seems fair to say that this is a drastic failure.  It is sweet, but not in any discernible malty fashion - more like an artificial sweetener like aspartame - while offering a skunky aftertaste without redemption.  Since I have never really tasted these characteristics, it made me wonder if it was off, but if it were draft lines there should be acetyl (which was absent) and for a brew pub with rotating kegs, it should be fresh, so I am left with my initial impression, that this was just dreadful on its own terms.

It is a good thing my experiences of the other beers were favourable since the Rousse was the token regret of the evening!  That said, I would give at least a grade of B to all of the others, though I don't think any hit the A range for me.  Admittedly, other than the saison, I never tried their Belgian styles and I did enjoy their seasonal Maple Smoked Porter at another event much more, but this is tempered praise (though praise nonetheless).  By this I mean that Benelux seems consistently good - and that assures my continued patronage - but it won't top my list for those 'must-taste-and-attend' places barring a pleasant surprise in the near future.

I have to add that for a brewpub with rotating taps, it seems odd that the rotation included four (or arguably, with the brown, 5) pale ales and 4 untasted Tripels and/or Belgian blondes (which I wasn't in the mood to try) and yet had not a single porter or stout, nor any other lager styles beyond the pilsner on the eve of my visit.  I did enjoy the pales, I understand that this changes often, and I look forward to the rotations (which are, to me, a big selling feature), but perhaps this diversity could be planned a bit better.

That all said, the service and atmosphere FAR top some other establishments that, despite also having the odd miss, have hit so hard on so many excellent beers.  I'd average the beer grade as a B to B+, but the establishment gets an A, so though I'd call some other places greater 'musts' for the beer geek, I'd much rather go here with the average friend over not only other craft bars, but over basically all bars!

Monday, 30 April 2012

Beer Label Art With A Purpose: A Crafty Use For Beer Labels

For quite some time now, I have been saving beer labels: peeling, drying, pressing, and saving.  Some thought my master plan to craft a collage was genius, others called me "obsessive."  Both may have an element of truth.

Yet, although it is mildy obsessive to not 'let go' of these fine labels (or poor labels for fine products), most of us have some similar attachment to that which we enjoy and some even collect bottles that take up huge amounts of space with no re-use (outside of home-brewing - which is different from standard bottle-collection).

Thus, in my obsessive ingenuity, I figured I should make collage beermats (that double as placemats) with my labels.

Alas, some of my favourite labels did not come easily or tore in removal, so though I am fond of many labels and beers that follow, there will always be more to come.

I have not laminated these yet, and the glare makes the images slightly less than perfect, but for those who watched me carefully peel labels at pubs and wished to observe the output, here are my first 4:





If you are curious, two decent hints to remove the labels are steaming or, oddly, the converse: soaking in icy cold wetness.  I suppose moisture is the common element.

I could offer some hints on a 'how to,' but I presume it to be straightforward as these four are not only the first beermat-label-collages I have ever made, they are the first four collages I have ever made and, with a few slight adjustments, I believe I did fine.

Let me know in the comments if you want more info or wish to pass on some unique labels!

Saturday, 28 April 2012

500 Rated Beers: First Substantive Milestone and Reflections on Reviewing

With some out-of-town company, I found myself at Dieu du Ciel again last night and I will share a few summaries and thoughts as I celebrate my personal 500-rated-beer-milestone.

Though just over a year ago I had rated only 250 beers and have since rated a further 250 doesn't mean I have had a year of rampant alcoholism.  In fact, at a few different events, I would have 15-30 tiny samples.  What it means is that I have been much more consistently systematic and original in my choices, having sought out more diverse options rather than standard, adored staples (though with consumption of a few of those too).

It is also worth noting that I distinguish between rated and reviewed.  A review requires some thought, some time, some privacy really, with me and my beer and a fair assessment as well as time to record these thoughts while not drinking more than one and socializing simultaneously.  A rating often has scant accompanying notes and is mainly a grade, though all of my 'reviewed' beers are also 'rated.'  Some of my 500 rated beers (maybe 100 or so of them) have had reviews as well, but when conditions aren't ideal only negligible notes remain.

In rating, not full review, I can offer the following from last night's (re)new(ed) tastes:

Rated Beer #497: Déesse Nocturne (Night Goddess) is a delectable dry stout with slightly bittering hops characteristics on the tongue, and a faint coffee quality.  Aromas are faintly of cocoa alongside deeply roasted maltiness expressed as nuttiness.  Dry, but still easy drinking and smooth/creamy if thick especially on nitro tap.  Grade: B+

Rated Beer #498: Rigor Mortis Blonde is a nice, smooth, enjoyable Abbey style blonde with sweaty pear aromas predominating alongside a much fruitier flavour that is sweeter despite an average ABV.  Grade: B+

Rated Beer #499: Revenante, a smoked porter, is a bold and unique, but very nice beer.  Most smoked porters seem to be only lightly smoked while rauchbiers tend to be too smoked for my tastes.  This is quite strongly smoked (almost like a rauch), offering aromas and flavours of campfires and tobacco, yet it is smoothed by the toasty malts and, for my tastes, it works more than many other smoked beers.  Grade: B+

Rated Beer #500: L'Herbe à Détourne, which DDC calls a "Citra Tripel," makes for a very nice fusion style by adding a tropical fruit and bittering hops to this classic style.  Though the fruits are strongly presented (and fit well with the style) the drying finish is a bit muted by the slightly excessive warming booziness and yeasty spiciness.  It is tasty, but probably a bit extreme in its representation of each of these (reinterpreted) style characteristics and would benefit from a smoother balance.  Enjoyable, but I can't drink two of them - and maybe even one should be shared, especially since its 10.2% comes across to both tongue and equilibrium!  Grade: B

Also, Péche Mortel is just as good as ever on nitro tap!

I don't know if is the nature of the review process or my academic-inspired understanding of critique, but I always feel I have to say the good and the bad in a review and hope that people grasp how far the good outweighs the bad, even if fairness demands commenting on that which could be improved.  Moreover, in the academic vein critique is most reserved for that which is praised or otherwise valued in order to strengthen that which shares common values and sentiment.

In that vein, I hope it is clear that I LOVE DDC, love their beers, love their brewpub, and always look forward to going back, but in the interest of fair reviewing and of provoking perfection out of excellence, I will say that I have been there three times since January and a few negative observations have arisen:

Service was best the first time (which was busy but not crazy busy and had one excellent server and one less solid one), was bad the second time despite being relatively empty, and was dreadful last night (at least table service, the barkeep was excellent before we got our table).  Yes, it was extremely busy and the staff was overworked and understaffed, though that seemed like only part of the problem as both table servers seemed extremely annoyed that we should even flag them down to ask for a drink and we were only once - upon our first seat procurement - solicited without taking countless attempts to flag them down.  I don't wholly fault the servers but, as this seems to be a continuing trend, increased staffing for weekend nights and an attempt to ensure we don't sit for over half-an-hour with empty drinks (as we twice did) alongside a friendly manner when happily flagged to remedy the situation would only keep me from adding these comments after praise for the quality of the product.

Also, though minor, all three (different) tables and two of the (perhaps different?) chairs I sat at during these visits were not even close to level.  Last night's barstool-chair rocked as much as an inch in either direction and it would be a true shame if this caused anyone to spill excellent beer.

I do enjoy the atmosphere and adore the beer (especially those you can only get there and the nitro tap) but a few minor tweaks could turn this from being one of the world's best brew-pubs into being an unparalleled marvel and an even greater Montreal landmark than it already is.  Even greatness can improve and I offer these to pursue that for a place that is already nearly atop my must-list for the city country.

Yet, I am thrilled to have rated my 500th beer here and I am sure there will be many  more!

Saturday, 21 April 2012

Reorienting Myself

So, with an invite to share my (infrequent, but nonetheless occasional) baseball thoughts at Big Smoke Signals, combined with my move, I have decided to reconsider my beer focus slightly.  I'll address the specifics in turn below.

First, on baseball, though I will still link to my baseball posts here, when they do arise, I will post them at Big Smoke Signals (and will begin with my delayed Jays' pitchers thoughts for 2012 shortly).

Second, I will - for presumably obvious reasons - be drinking more Quebec beer and attending more Quebec beer events.  Thus, it seems only logical that there will be a disproportionate focus on Montreal area beers, breweries, bars, news, and events.  Though I have not blogged excessively about this yet, I am only beginning to orient myself towards the scene here.

However, I will not neglect those stories of note from elsewhere or those tastings for (Canadian or literal) imports, though they will likely diminish.  For those in Quebec, welcome to my blog; for those outside, I hope you visit and do so with anticipation of tasting beers mentioned herein!

Finally, though I still may periodically comment on politics and/or Linux, as I have yet to do so since I comment of politics for a living and on Linux on Facebook, I have removed this description from the blogroll.

That doesn't mean I won't retain my right to multi-task herein, but it means I have chosen to focus on the maltyness of the name and the pun may, from here-on-in, refer to my other interests and external expressions rather than the blog scope.

The links remain and shall!

Friday, 20 April 2012

The Case for Beer: And How I Lost 55 Pounds While Drinking Beer More Often

A friend passed along this excellent infographic, which led me to write my long-pondered thoughts on beer, health, and weight which follow after "the Case of for Beer."

Beer Infographic
Source: FrugalDad.com

Myself, I have consumed beer far more regularly in the last 16 months than in the previous years of my life.  Yes, I used to drink far more at a time, far more often, but since February 2011 I have both gone from around 250 rated beers to 492 while also losing around 55 pounds.

How?

Well, not only do I rarely drink to excess (though when I do I still attempt to stay within my daily caloric allowance), but I typically have one beer most evenings and only when it won't push me over my daily calorie and carbohydrate allowances (which are determined by my goals and sparkpeople.com).

Moreover, consider the following:

A typical pale ale has (12 oz bottle): 150 Calories, 14 grams carbohydrates (and nothing else, though stouts, porters, and browns often have 1-3 grams of protein also)

Average orange juice (12 oz): 164 calories, 1 gram fat, 37.5 grams carbohydrates, 33 grams sugar.

I am not going to say that beer is healthier than orange juice, but it is easier to drink - in moderation - while watching your weight, provided that you get your fruit and vegetable intake from whole foods.

Finally, exercise (both cardio and strength) and exercise harder after one of those rare excessive drinking nights.  Oddly enough, I have discovered that strenuous exercise is the best cure for a hangover (provided you properly hydrate while so so doing) and also allows me to lose weight and build muscle even during weeks of extremes (such as the holidays).

Beer, like all carbs, need not be cut from your diet if seeking to control your weight, but for me (as for many), keeping track of your consumption allows these pleasures in quantities that are conducive to a healthy enjoyment of life's finer pleasures!

Wednesday, 18 April 2012

Play Ball! A Delayed Assessment of the Blue Jays' Bats

Though the ball season is well underway (or ten games in for the Blue Jays), I thought I'd post some reasons for my excitement this season and some predictions/hopes/thoughts.

As it stands, the Jays are currently 6-4, two games above .500, and just a half game out of first place... behind the Orioles.  If you need further evidence that small sample sizes mean little in a game where 162 games are player, the best teams win about 60% of the time (and the worst 40%), and the average hitter succeeds (in getting on base) one time in three, simply read that first sentence again and realize which club currently leads the AL East.

<Pause for effect>

Yes, samples right now mean little.  Especially when 0-fer slides make for a .000 batting average though an 0-fer skid in August for a guy who'd been on fire until then changes little.  Maybe with a HR (and walk and Sac fly) last night, those 'worried' about Bautista will get over it, maybe not.

Regardless, here are some of my Blue Jays thoughts and predictions for the season as we go around the diamond - starting today with the position players and continuing within a few days with the pitchers and some final thoughts on why this team is exciting.

C: Arencibia will hit for a higher average than his current .063... but how much more?  I jest slightly, though I do worry about his strikeout rate and poor plate discipline.  He is and has always been a fastball hitter, a tendency which bodes poorly for guys with poor discipline in their sophomore season (especially) and beyond when players tend to see an increase in breaking balls after pitchers see them turn around on some.  If he had some patience, he might take these pitches for balls - or go with them when they hang over the plate - but without it, he'll find himself in holes thereby exacerbating his already worrisome strikeout rate.  Insofar as not making an out is the most important thing a hitter can do (and insofar as OBP measures that frequency), consider that Arencibia would have to increase his OBP nearly 50 points over last season's .282 to even be 'league average' at this crucial aspect.  A lot was made of his power, but in the absence of OBP, his OPS+ was only 90 and so he was a below average hitter.  Yes, his average should go up some and, yes, he will drive some balls, but probably not enough to mitigate the poor eye and the resulting change on pitcher approach.  With D'Arnaud below him - I hope JP is the one who ultimately gets moved.  Don't get me wrong: he is better than Mathis and his D is better than he is often credited for (though he has let a few too many balls get by him early), but he is (by OBP and OPS) likely to never be better than an average hitting catcher and probably a below average or nearly average defensive catcher at best.  There is a place for guys like that in MLB and wish him a long, productive future... elsewhere while D'Arnaud (with better patience, contact rate, power projection, and defence) helps bring us over the top into long-term contention.  For this season, this is not so much a weak spot as it is a spot without noteworthy strength.  (And I haven't even mentioned Mathis, whose glove/arm are not nearly good enough to justify his bat, though maybe Murphy has turned him around since he currently has a 1.405 OPS! ;)  Arencibia prediction: .234/.287/.441

1B: Lind is probably not as good a hitter as his 2009 made it appear.  He is probably also not as bad a hitter as his 2010 and 2011 made it appear.  It seems to me as if something mental is going on since he has lost his patience a bit, swinging at more poor pitches, and pulling more than he should be.  Perhaps this comes back to (hitting coach) Dwayne Murphy's philosophies.  Who knows?  Regardless, Lind is at his best: 1) Against righties and should be platooned (at least temporarily) against southpaws; 2) When he covers the whole plate and drives the ball to the opposite field.  I have some faith in Lind as his swing is nice/smooth (if at times a bit long), his ability to hit the ball for power the other way is great, he has decent discipline (at times - though not currently seen in walk rate, but when going well observed by pitch selectiveness), and he just can't get much worse - though I would still like him to be much more consistent at the plate for a 1B!  That said, my prediction for Lind depends upon whether he platoons at all, but I'll guess .263/.311/.478

2B: Kelly Johnson was (is?) underappreciated by Jays fans.  I think part of it was missing Aaron Hill and part of it may be that he isn't as flashy personality wise or defensively as Hill, but consider the following: both are comparatively good defensively (with the flashiness/diving/range nod going a bit to Hill and the double-play pivot going to Johnson), while their career slash lines are .266/.321/.417 for Hill to Johnson's .260/.343.441.  Thus, despite a (merely 6-point) higher batting average (the most useless of the stats), Johnson has a 22 point higher career OBP and a 24 point higher slugging percentage.  Overall it means Hill has been 6 percent worse than average offensively (with OPS+ as indicator at 94) while Johnson has been 6 percent above average by the same measure (at 106). Moreover, Hill is a notorious fastball hitter and bad-ball chaser, whereas Johnson's eye bodes well for rebounding and future success more prominently than Hill's approach.  This IS an upgrade, all due respect to Aaron.  Johnson furthermore has thus far seemed to bounce back and I have few fears of at least comparable success to his (pre-2011) past.  My guess: .268/.355/.442

3B: Lawrie... well, what is there to say.  Yes, there'll be an adjustment/readjustment process and a learning curve to temper harness his admirable exuberance, but he'll be good.  This year, I'll say .275/.343/.468

SS: Yunel is sure and steady if you ask me.  .288/.365/.412 with solid D.

RF: Joey Bats: much has been made of his struggles early, but sample size is everything.  Again, consider the discipline, though I think he might be trying a bit too hard to be 'the new(ish) Joey Bats.'  That might cause a few problems for a while, but he'll figure it out.  My prediction: .272/.417/.595

CF: Colby is both a great prospect and a huge question mark.  So far he has appeared to me to be driving the ball well, if right at people (and has been robbed a couple of times).  That bodes well, but the numbers are still down.  If he keeps his fairly disciplined approach and keeps driving the balls he wants to hit, these should come around, but I just don't know.  I am more confident in my guesses on other batters, but Colby could be anywhere from solid to dreadful.  I'll try to make a moderate guess though and hope for (much) better while wishing against any worse.  .247/.313/.419

LF: Oh that depends who plays.  I get it folks, everyone who listens to Buck and Pat thinks Thames looks great.  Satchel Price asks a great question: "Why was his rookie performance so much better than Snider's? In 2011, Thames' rookie year, he hit .262/.313/.456 over 362 PA's. Over a short trial in 2008 and his first half-season in 2009, Snider hit .255/.331/.430 over 356 PA's. Thames was 24. Snider was 21 by the end of the second season."  We have likely also seen Thames at his best considering his approach, career trends, etc.  I can't imagine Snider would hit any worse than Thames, has way more upside, is a few years younger and his defence is FAR, FAR BETTER.  If either plays the majority of the year, here are my estimations: Thames: .257/.308/.435, Snider: .268/.311/.458.


DH: Edwin has looked great of late and seems to have made some changes in approach and swing, but he is streaky and always looks great when the going is good.  It is hard to say, but I do think he'll be coming (more) into his own this year.  With my optimism, I'll guess .274/.323/.510


Bench:
Mathis: .500/.571/.833 (LOL) I am so upset about a mediocre defensive catcher with terrible hitting that I'll just dream of a fanciful world where his (once praised) pedigree comes through and where Murphy pulls off the late-life, Bautista-like but exaggerated miracle to make his current numbers stand through the season saving us from JP!


Vizquel: At his age, who knows, but solid D and solid bench player.


Francisco: Meh.  Mediocre D, Mediocre bat: .258/.328/.410


Davis: .261/.310/.366 with lots of late inning steals (and defence sub if Thames plays too much).

I promise the rest soon!